Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a significant two-tier upgrade over the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. While the Vega 56 was a powerful high-end card in 2017, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (2024) provides roughly 130-150% more performance while offering far better power efficiency.
The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 16GB of GDDR6X memory and 8,448 CUDA cores on the Ada Lovelace architecture, enabling advanced Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 with Frame Generation. The RX Vega 56, based on the GCN 5.0 architecture, uses 8GB of HBM2 memory and lacks dedicated hardware for ray tracing. While its 410 GB/s memory bandwidth was impressive at launch, the modern architectural improvements and specialized AI cores of the 4070 Ti SUPER make it vastly superior for current and future games.
Ultimately, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the winner for 4K and 1440p gaming. The Radeon RX Vega 56 remains a capable 1080p card for legacy systems, but it cannot match the features, performance headroom, or efficiency of a modern enthusiast-tier card like the 4070 Ti SUPER.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 56 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 106.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 56.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-106.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+106.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 86% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 254.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+254.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 4070
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 13,026 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 106.7%. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1471 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,026 | 26,919+107% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5888+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.54 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+177% |
| Boost Clock | 1471 MHz | 2475 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+22% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 5.8 MB+559% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 56 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 22.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 410 GB/s | 504 GB/s+23% |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+967% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 56 draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 200W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 280mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 134.6+117% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 86.4% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.7 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 255.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-86% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.7+255% | 48.9 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | AD104 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #199 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce RTX 4070
