Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 56 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 65.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+65.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-65.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (280mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 65.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+65.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega 56 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 56 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 13,026 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon RX Vega 56 leads by 65.5%. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1471 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	13,026+66%	7,869
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+300%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.54 TFLOPS+253%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1471 MHz	1665 MHz+13%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	224+300%	56
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega 56 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 220.3% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	410 GB/s+220%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	2048-bit+1500%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCE 4.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 7.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 56 draws 210W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 280mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 56	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	210W	75W-64%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	None
Length	280mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	62.0	104.9+69%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.7 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 65.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).