
Radeon RX Vega 6 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650

Radeon RX Vega 6
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 6.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 6 and Iris Plus Graphics 650

Radeon RX Vega 6
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.

Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 6 scores 1,492 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 6 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,492 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 4096+967% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS+1333% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz+34% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+967% | 6 |
| TMUs | 256+433% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 6 draws 295W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 180.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1 | 100.0+1861% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Radeon RX Vega 6 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 6 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 100.0 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | August 7 2017 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #171 | #718 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















