Radeon RX Vega 6 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6

2017Core: 1247 MHzBoost: 1546 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon RX Vega 6 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX Vega 6 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX Vega 6

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1866.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021

Why buy it

  • Radeon RX Vega 6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 295W, a 280W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,500 vs 1,492), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon RX Vega 6 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6

The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 6 scores 1,492 and the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 6 is built on GCN 5.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 6UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score
1,492
1,500
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Gen. 12
Process Node
14 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
4096+12700%
32
Boost Clock
1546 MHz+7%
1450 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 6UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon RX Vega 6 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 6UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 6 draws 295W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 180.6% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 6UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP
295W
15W-95%
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
5.1
100.0+1861%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX Vega 6 came in at $0, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 6UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Vega 10
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
August 7 2017
May 11 2021
Ranking
#171
#709

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.