
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Radeon RX Vega 6
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Radeon RX Vega 6 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Radeon RX Vega 6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Radeon RX Vega 6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 295W, a 283W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon RX Vega 6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2358.3% higher power demand at 295W vs 12W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Radeon RX Vega 6
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) scores 1,500 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 48 (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,492 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 48 | 4096+8433% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1546 MHz+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) draws 12W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 184.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-96% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 125.0+2351% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #760 | #171 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















