GeForce 940MX
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 940MX
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce 940MX is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌91.7% higher power demand at 23W vs 12W.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 23W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 940MX vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 48 (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,509 | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+967% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 861 MHz | 1100 MHz+28% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 940MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940MX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) carries 0 MB. GeForce 940MX gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 940MX and System on the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 940MX) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce 940MX) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce 940MX) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,AVC,MPEG-2,JPEG (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,AVC,MPEG-2,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)'s 12W — a 62.9% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W | 12W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 65.6 | 125.0+91% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 940MX came in at $100, while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.1 (GeForce 940MX) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 |
| Release | June 28 2016 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #764 | #760 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 940MX and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
