
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

RTXA5000-6Q
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs RTXA5000-6Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs RTXA5000-6Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs RTXA5000-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 230W, a 218W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
RTXA5000-6Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1816.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 12W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs RTXA5000-6Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

RTXA5000-6Q
The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) scores 1,500 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 10 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 48 (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,522+1% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Ampere |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 48 | 8192+16967% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1695 MHz+54% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q carries 512 MB. RTXA5000-6Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) draws 12W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 180.2% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-95% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 125.0+1794% | 6.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) came in at $0, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-6Q (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | RTXA5000-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.6 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | GA102 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #760 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















