Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro V8700

2011Core: 725 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Performance Spectrum

FirePro V8700
4 GB 150
1,539
+2.6%
brand logoRadeon R5 M435
brand logoRadeon HD 8600/8700M
brand logoRadeon R5 430 OEM
brand logoRadeon HD 5770
brand logoRadeon R9 280X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Shared System RAM 12
1,500
0.0%
brand logoArc Graphics 130T
brand logoArc A770M
brand logoArc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V8700

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V8700 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1150% higher power demand at 150W vs 12W.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 12W instead of 150W, a 138W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V8700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,539 vs 1,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V8700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V8700

The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 48 (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)).

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
G3D Mark Score
1,539+3%
1,500
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
1280+2567%
48
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) carries 0 MB. FirePro V8700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU).

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
DirectX
10.1
12 (12_1)+19%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V8700) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,AVC,MPEG-2,JPEG (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)).

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Encoder
None
QuickSync
Decoder
UVD 2.0
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,AVC,MPEG-2,JPEG
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)'s 12W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 85.

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
TDP
150W
12W-92%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
254mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60-29%
85
Perf/Watt
10.3
125.0+1114%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro V8700Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
MSRP
$1499
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
Infinity
Codename
Cayman
Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Release
May 24 2011
May 28 2019
Ranking
#656
#760
Search FirePro V8700 on AmazonSearch Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.