
Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon RX Vega 6

Iris Plus Graphics 650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 6.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega 6

Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Radeon RX Vega 6
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,500 | 1,492 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+1333% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1546 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 6 | 64+967% |
| TMUs | 48 | 256+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 180.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+1861% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega 6 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 100.0 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 3 2017 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #718 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















