FirePro V8700
Iris Plus Graphics 650
FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V8700
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Plus Graphics 650 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro V8700 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V8700 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro V8700
The FirePro V8700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,539 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V8700 scores 1,539 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V8700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V8700) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V8700) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,539+3% | 1,500 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+110% | 0.8832 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+433% | 6 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro V8700 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 carries 0 MB. FirePro V8700 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V8700 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro V8700) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 (12_1)+19% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V8700) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Decoder: UVD 2.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V8700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics 650).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V8700 draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V8700) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 254mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60 vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 254mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 60-29% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 100.0+871% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V8700 came in at $1499, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 650 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (FirePro V8700) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 650 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V8700 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Cayman | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | May 24 2011 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #656 | #718 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V8700 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
