Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs RTXA5000-6Q

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 650

2017Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTXA5000-6Q

2021Core: 1170 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs RTXA5000-6Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs RTXA5000-6Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Plus Graphics 650

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 230W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

RTXA5000-6Q

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Plus Graphics 650 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RTXA5000-6Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 1433.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTXA5000-6Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (1,522 vs 1,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTXA5000-6Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTXA5000-6Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs RTXA5000-6Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics 650

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

NVIDIA

RTXA5000-6Q

The RTXA5000-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,522 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 scores 1,500 and the RTXA5000-6Q reaches 1,522 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is built on Generation 9.5 while the RTXA5000-6Q uses Ampere, both on 14 nm++ vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-6Q). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-6Q). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 650RTXA5000-6Q
G3D Mark Score
1,500
1,522+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm++
8 nm
Shading Units
384
8192+2033%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8832 TFLOPS
27.77 TFLOPS+3044%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1695 MHz+47%
ROPs
6
96+1500%
TMUs
48
256+433%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-6Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 650RTXA5000-6Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-6Q carries 512 MB. RTXA5000-6Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Plus Graphics 650 and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-6Q.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 650RTXA5000-6Q
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 650 draws 15W versus the RTXA5000-6Q's 230W — a 175.5% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 350W (RTXA5000-6Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 650RTXA5000-6Q
TDP
15W-93%
230W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
100.0+1415%
6.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Plus Graphics 650 came in at $0, while the RTXA5000-6Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, Iris Plus Graphics 650 was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 650) vs 0.6 (RTXA5000-6Q) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-6Q (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Plus Graphics 650RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP
$0-100%
$2500
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.6
Codename
Kaby Lake GT3e
GA102
Release
January 3 2017
April 12 2021
Ranking
#718
#53

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.