Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 650
The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 scores 1,538 and the Iris Plus Graphics 650 reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 384 (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Raw compute: 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 0.8832 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,538+3% | 1,500 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8448 TFLOPS | 0.8832 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1150 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 6 | 6 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and System on the Iris Plus Graphics 650.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 draws 15W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 650's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 650). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 102.5+3% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 came in at $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 650 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 650) — the Iris Plus Graphics 650 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Iris Plus Graphics 650 (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Release | September 5 2014 | January 3 2017 |
| Ranking | #763 | #718 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Iris Plus Graphics 650
