
Radeon RX Vega11 vs GRID M10-2B

Radeon RX Vega11
Popular choices:

GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega11 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-2B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega11.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega11 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $80 for the GRID M10-2B, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 95.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega11 and GRID M10-2B

Radeon RX Vega11
The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega11 scores 1,605 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega11 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 704 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B). Boost clocks: 1251 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,605 | 1,644+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 704 | 2048+191% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+174% |
| Boost Clock | 1251 MHz+6% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 44 | 128+191% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega11 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-2B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega11 draws 35W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 45.9+529% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 and now averages $80. The Radeon RX Vega11 costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) — the Radeon RX Vega11 offers 94.7% better value. The Radeon RX Vega11 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | GRID M10-2B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-94% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-50% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.1+95% | 20.6 |
| Codename | Raven | GM204 |
| Release | May 10 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #673 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















