
Radeon RX Vega11 vs Quadro K2000D

Radeon RX Vega11
Popular choices:

Quadro K2000D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega11 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega11 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $35 versus $40 for the Radeon RX Vega11, it costs 13% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 13.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega11 and Quadro K2000D

Radeon RX Vega11
The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.

Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega11 scores 1,605 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega11 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 704 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,605 | 1,600 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 704+83% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS+140% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega11 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000D has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000D offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega11 draws 35W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 37.2% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-31% | 51W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 45.9+46% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro K2000D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro K2000D costs 12.5% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) — the Quadro K2000D offers 14% better value. The Radeon RX Vega11 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega11 | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $35-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.1 | 45.7+14% |
| Codename | Raven | GK107 |
| Release | May 10 2018 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #673 | #750 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















