Radeon RX Vega11 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 390.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega11.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-390.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+390.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 161.5% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX Vega11.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+161.5%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega11 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega11 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX Vega11

The Radeon RX Vega11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,605 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega11 scores 1,605 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 390.3%. The Radeon RX Vega11 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 704 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1251 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	1,605	7,869+390%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	704	896+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.761 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock	1251 MHz	1665 MHz+33%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	44	56+27%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega11 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega11 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega11	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	45.9	104.9+129%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega11 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon RX Vega11 costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.1 (Radeon RX Vega11) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 161.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).