Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $250 for the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 411.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+411.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U scores 1,546 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,582+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+654% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+106% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+433% | 6 |
| TMUs | 88+83% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U draws 100W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 15W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.5 | 105.5+581% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 80% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 409.7% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $150-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2 | 31.6+410% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 28 2020 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #336 | #755 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
