Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U vs Radeon 630
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Popular choices:
Radeon 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $250 for the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 409.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+409.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Radeon 630
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.
Radeon 630
The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U scores 1,546 and the Radeon 630 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 630 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 512 (Radeon 630). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,575+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+175% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+271% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+35% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 630) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U draws 100W versus the Radeon 630's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 350W (Radeon 630). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 15.5 | 31.5+103% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon 630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Radeon 630 costs 80% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 31.5 (Radeon 630) — the Radeon 630 offers 408.1% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Radeon 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2 | 31.5+408% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #336 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Radeon 630
