Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U vs Quadro K2000
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Popular choices:
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 95.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Quadro K2000
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points.
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U scores 1,546 and the Quadro K2000 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,546 | 1,582+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+532% | 0.7327 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U draws 100W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 64.9% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 51W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.5 | 31.0+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U costs 50% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U offers 93.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U | Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-58% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2+94% | 3.2 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK107 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #336 | #756 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U and Quadro K2000
