CPU
GPU
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Popular choices:
GeForce MX250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX250.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $350 for the Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H, it costs 57% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 132.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+132.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H and GeForce MX250
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,379 points.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H scores 2,379 and the GeForce MX250 reaches 2,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 1845 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,379 | 2,375 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+552% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1845 MHz+78% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+267% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H draws 110W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 166.7% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 10W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.6 | 237.5+1000% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX250 costs 57.1% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.8 (Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the GeForce MX250 offers 132.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $150-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $150-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 15.8+132% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP108B |
| Release | October 7 2019 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #297 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H and GeForce MX250
