
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:

Iris Graphics 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Graphics 550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Graphics 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 550 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and Iris Graphics 550

Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.

Iris Graphics 550
The Iris Graphics 550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H scores 3,245 and the Iris Graphics 550 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Iris Graphics 550 uses Generation 9.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 550). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 550). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,245 | 3,311+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 1792+367% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+2047% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+130% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+967% | 6 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 550 has 0 MB. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H draws 43W versus the Iris Graphics 550's 15W — a 96.6% difference. The Iris Graphics 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 550). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 15W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 75.5 | 220.7+192% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Iris Graphics 550 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Graphics 550 costs 100+% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 550) — the Iris Graphics 550 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Iris Graphics 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Skylake GT3e |
| Release | August 8 2025 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #229 | #775 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.



















