Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U vs GeForce MX250
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
Popular choices:
GeForce MX250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX250 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 209.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+209.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U and GeForce MX250
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,301 points.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U scores 2,301 and the GeForce MX250 reaches 2,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,301 | 2,375+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+367% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+1968% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+122% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+367% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+256% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U draws 43W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 124.5% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W | 10W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 237.5+344% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce MX250 costs 66.7% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the GeForce MX250 offers 209.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $150-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $150-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 15.8+210% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GP108B |
| Release | August 8 2025 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #229 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 4800U and GeForce MX250
