Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
VS
FirePro W9000

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS vs FirePro W9000

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 2100 MHz
VS

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is positioned at rank 369 and the FirePro W9000 is on rank 317, so the FirePro W9000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

#359
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1084%
#361
982%
#362
980%
#366
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
891%
#367
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
885%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#372
Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#373
Radeon HD 7660G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#374
Radeon HD 6670/7670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
95%
#375
Radeon 620
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#376
Radeon R5 435
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
95%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
93%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
#380
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000

#302
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9593%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
100%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
99%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
99%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
99%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
98%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
96%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
92%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
92%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
90%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
89%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
89%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
86%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
84%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 75% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 309.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+309.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS and FirePro W9000

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 6,012 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is built on RDNA 2.0 while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
G3D Mark Score
6,012
6,157+2%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+115%
3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9000 has 6 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS draws 100W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 93% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
TDP
100W-64%
274W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
93°C
Perf/Watt
60.1+167%
22.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 and now averages $150. The FirePro W9000 costs 75% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 41.0 (FirePro W9000) — the FirePro W9000 offers 310% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HSFirePro W9000
MSRP
$600-85%
$3999
Avg Price (30d)
$600
$150-75%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
41.0+310%
Codename
Navi 23
Tahiti
Release
January 4 2022
June 14 2012
Ranking
#135
#390