
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS vs RTX A400

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is positioned at rank 369 and the RTX A400 is on rank 26, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A400.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $135 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 342.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+342.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS and RTX A400

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 6,012 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2100 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,012 | 5,983 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+218% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2100 MHz+19% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+433% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS draws 100W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1 | 119.7+99% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The RTX A400 costs 77.5% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 343% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $135-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $135-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 44.3+343% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GA107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #135 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















