
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is on rank 369, so the GeForce MX570 A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX570 A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 106.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+106.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2100 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 32 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208+3% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+82% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2100 MHz+82% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 32+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 120% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-75% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+313% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 and now averages $600. The GeForce MX570 A costs 50% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 107% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+107% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #387 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.



















