Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS vs Quadro K5200
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is positioned at rank 369 and the Quadro K5200 is on rank 254, so the Quadro K5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $600 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 776.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+776.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS and Quadro K5200
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 6,012 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 2100 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,012 | 6,149+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+142% | 3.553 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2100 MHz+172% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 has 8 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS draws 100W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+47% | 41.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 and now averages $70. The Quadro K5200 costs 88.3% less ($530 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.0 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) vs 87.8 (Quadro K5200) — the Quadro K5200 offers 778% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600-73% | $2250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $70-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 87.8+778% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GK110B |
| Release | January 4 2022 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #135 | #391 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS and Quadro K5200
