Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Tesla C2075
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs Tesla C2075 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 247W, a 217W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla C2075
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌723.3% higher power demand at 247W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 9 2023. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1900 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.
Tesla C2075
The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU scores 3,000 and the Tesla C2075 reaches 3,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is built on RDNA 2 while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) vs 448 (Tesla C2075).
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000 | 3,017 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+14% | 448 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU draws 30W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 156.7% difference. The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 247W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+720% | 12.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Steam Deck 8CU came in at $0, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Steam Deck 8CU) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Steam Deck 8CU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | Tesla C2075 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | RDNA 2 Sephiroth | GF110 |
| Release | November 9 2023 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #480 | #553 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Steam Deck 8CU and Tesla C2075
