
Radeon X1550 vs GeForce Go 6600

Radeon X1550
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1550 and GeForce Go 6600

Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1550 scores 67 and the GeForce Go 6600 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce Go 6600 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1550) vs 960 (GeForce Go 6600). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 69+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 960+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz+15% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1550 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB. The Radeon X1550 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon X1550) vs 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1550) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1550) vs None (GeForce Go 6600). Decoder: Avivo vs VP1.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | None |
| Decoder | Avivo | VP1 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1550 draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 6600's 140W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon X1550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1550) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-64% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+160% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Lexa | GK106 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #668 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















