
Radeon X1550 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225

Radeon X1550
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon X1550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4225.
| Insight | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 221.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+221.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1550 and Mobility Radeon HD 4225

Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1550 scores 67 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 reaches 66 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1550) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225).
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67+2% | 66 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+8% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1550 draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4225's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1550) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1550 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1550) vs 4.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 offers 214.3% better value. The Radeon X1550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 4.4+214% |
| Codename | Lexa | Broadway |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #668 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















