
Radeon X1550
Popular choices:

RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon X1550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon X1550, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 433.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+433.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1550 and RADEON X700

Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1550 scores 67 versus the RADEON X700's 73 — the RADEON X700 leads by 9%. The Radeon X1550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X1550) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 73+9% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2304+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+832% |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 2450 MHz+107% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 144+350% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1550 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon X1550) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1550 draws 50W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon X1550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1550) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-71% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+225% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1550 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. The RADEON X700 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X1550) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 offers 421.4% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1550 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 7.3+421% |
| Codename | Lexa | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #668 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















