Radeon X1950 GT vs Mobility Radeon X1700
Radeon X1950 GT
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1950 GT is positioned at rank 339 and the Mobility Radeon X1700 is on rank 631, so the Radeon X1950 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1950 GT
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1950 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The Radeon X1950 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon X1700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1950 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1700.
| Insight | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1950 GT, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 223.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+223.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1950 GT and Mobility Radeon X1700
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Mobility Radeon X1700
The Mobility Radeon X1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1950 GT scores 106 and the Mobility Radeon X1700 reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1950 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon X1700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1700). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1700).
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 106 | 105 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+540% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.8 TFLOPS+2025% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 128+700% | 16 |
| TMUs | 320+700% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+1150% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1950 GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1700 has 256 MB. The Radeon X1950 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1700) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1700). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Decoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1950 GT draws 335W versus the Mobility Radeon X1700's 50W — a 148.1% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 335W | 50W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 230mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 2.1+600% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Mobility Radeon X1700 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X1700 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 7.0 (Mobility Radeon X1700) — the Mobility Radeon X1700 offers 218.2% better value. The Radeon X1950 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | Mobility Radeon X1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | $49-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 7.0+218% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Broadway |
| Release | May 10 2022 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #25 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1950 GT and Mobility Radeon X1700
