Radeon X1950 GT
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon X1950 GT vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon X1950 GT

2022Core: 1925 MHzBoost: 2324 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1950 GT is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1950 GT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
9545%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
9170%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
9063%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
9047%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
9029%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
8978%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
8864%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8832%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8750%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
8726%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
8621%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8603%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
8447%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8442%
#324
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
10526%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
100%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
95%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
89%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
87%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
83%
#345
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
76%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
76%
#347
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
76%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
75%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
71%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
68%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
66%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
66%
#354
RADEON X600 SE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7323.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1950 GT.

InsightRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-7323.6%)
Leading raw performance (+7323.6%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4750.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1950 GT.

InsightRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+4750.1%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($49)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1950 GT and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon X1950 GT

The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1950 GT scores 106 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 7323.6%. The Radeon X1950 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2324 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
106
7,869+7324%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
5120+471%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
23.8 TFLOPS+698%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2324 MHz+40%
1665 MHz
ROPs
128+300%
32
TMUs
320+471%
56
L1 Cache
1 MB+14%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon X1950 GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9_0c
12+33%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Avivo vs NVDEC 4th gen.

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
Avivo
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
Avivo
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon X1950 GT draws 335W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 126.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 230mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
335W
75W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
230mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.3
104.9+34867%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon X1950 GT costs 34.7% less ($26 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4668.2% better value. The Radeon X1950 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon X1950 GTGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$140-6%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$49-35%
$75
Performance per Dollar
2.2
104.9+4668%
Codename
Navi 21
TU117
Release
May 10 2022
April 23 2019
Ranking
#25
#323