Radeon X1950 GT vs GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon X1950 GT
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon X1950 GT is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1950 GT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15933% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1950 GT.
| Insight | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15933%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15933%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2618.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1950 GT.
| Insight | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2618.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1950 GT and GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1950 GT scores 106 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 15933%. The Radeon X1950 GT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 2324 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 112.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 106 | 16,995+15933% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+43% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.8 TFLOPS+87% | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2324 MHz+31% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+167% | 48 |
| TMUs | 320+186% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+186% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1950 GT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: Avivo vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Avivo | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | — | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1950 GT draws 335W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 65.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 230mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 335W | 170W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 230mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 100.0+33233% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The Radeon X1950 GT costs 83% less ($240 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.2 (Radeon X1950 GT) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2572.7% better value. The Radeon X1950 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon X1950 GT | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-57% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-83% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 58.8+2573% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA106 |
| Release | May 10 2022 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #25 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1950 GT and GeForce RTX 3060
