RADEON X550XT vs FirePro 2450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X550XT is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550XT

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

6477%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

6222%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

6150%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

6139%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

6127%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

6092%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

6015%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

5993%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

5937%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

5921%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

5850%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

5837%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

5732%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

5729%

#315

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

7143%

#330

RADEON X550XT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $40

100%

#334

Radeon X1650 Pro

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

76%

#336

RADEON X550

MSRP: $60|Avg: $10

76%

#337

Radeon HD 8350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $39

73%

#339

Radeon X1950 GT

MSRP: $140|Avg: $49

68%

#340

GeForce 6600 GT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

64%

#341

RADEON X600 PRO

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

61%

#342

Radeon X1600 Pro

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

59%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

56%

#345

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

52%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X550XT is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The RADEON X550XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 2450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X550XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 2450.

Insight	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+9.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.8%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro 2450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $40 for the RADEON X550XT, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 264.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+264.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X550XT Benchmark Check

FirePro 2450 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X550XT and FirePro 2450

RADEON X550XT

The RADEON X550XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 56 points.

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550XT scores 56 versus the FirePro 2450's 51 — the RADEON X550XT leads by 9.8%. The RADEON X550XT is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro 2450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550XT) vs 384 (FirePro 2450). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (RADEON X550XT) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450).

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
G3D Mark Score	56+10%	51
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+127%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON X550XT) vs 256 KB (FirePro 2450) — the RADEON X550XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (RADEON X550XT) vs 10.1 (FirePro 2450). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
DirectX	9.0b	10.1+12%
OpenGL	2.0	3.3+65%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON X550XT) vs UVD (FirePro 2450). Decoder: None vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON X550XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450).

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
Encoder	None	UVD
Decoder	None	UVD
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X550XT draws 50W versus the FirePro 2450's 150W — a 100% difference. The RADEON X550XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550XT) vs 350W (FirePro 2450). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 60°C.

Feature	RADEON X550XT	FirePro 2450
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	170mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65	60°C-8%
Perf/Watt	1.1+267%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X550XT launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro 2450 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The FirePro 2450 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON X550XT) vs 5.1 (FirePro 2450) — the FirePro 2450 offers 264.3% better value. The RADEON X550XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).