CPU
GPU
RADEON X550XT
Popular choices:
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X550XT is positioned at rank 330 and the RADEON E2400 is on rank 351, so the RADEON X550XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550XT
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X550XT uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X550XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON E2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X550XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON E2400.
| Insight | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X550XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $100 for the RADEON E2400, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 169.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+169.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X550XT and RADEON E2400
RADEON X550XT
The RADEON X550XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 56 points.
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550XT scores 56 versus the RADEON E2400's 52 — the RADEON X550XT leads by 7.7%. The RADEON X550XT is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550XT) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (RADEON X550XT) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 56+8% | 52 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+37% | 0.9085 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+8% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X550XT draws 50W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550XT) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+10% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X550XT launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The RADEON X550XT costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON X550XT) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON X550XT offers 180% better value. The RADEON X550XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-50% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+180% | 0.5 |
| Codename | Lexa | Lexa |
| Release | March 27 2019 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #772 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X550XT and RADEON E2400
