
RADEON X550XT vs GeForce 8200M G

RADEON X550XT
Popular choices:

GeForce 8200M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X550XT is positioned at rank #330 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X550XT uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X550XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8200M G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8200M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 16.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X550XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-16.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+16.1%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8200M G remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X550XT and GeForce 8200M G

RADEON X550XT
The RADEON X550XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 56 points.

GeForce 8200M G
The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X550XT scores 56 versus the GeForce 8200M G's 65 — the GeForce 8200M G leads by 16.1%. The RADEON X550XT is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 8200M G uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON X550XT) vs 384 (GeForce 8200M G). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (RADEON X550XT) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 56 | 65+16% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+44% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+8% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X550XT comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8200M G has 256 MB. The RADEON X550XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON X550XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) — the GeForce 8200M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (RADEON X550XT) vs 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 8200M G). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 11.1 (FL10_0)+23% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3+65% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: None vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON X550XT) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8200M G).
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | — |
| Decoder | None | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X550XT draws 50W versus the GeForce 8200M G's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X550XT) vs 350W (GeForce 8200M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 70°C.
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 2.0+82% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X550XT launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce 8200M G launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 8200M G costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON X550XT) vs Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) — the GeForce 8200M G offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON X550XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | RADEON X550XT | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lexa | GM108 |
| Release | March 27 2019 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #772 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















