
Radeon X550XTX vs GeForce Go 6600

Radeon X550XTX
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X550XTX is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon X550XTX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X550XTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6600.
| Insight | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X550XTX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X550XTX and GeForce Go 6600

Radeon X550XTX
The Radeon X550XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X550XTX scores 71 and the GeForce Go 6600 reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X550XTX is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce Go 6600 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X550XTX) vs 960 (GeForce Go 6600). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon X550XTX) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71+3% | 69 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 960+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.981 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+18% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X550XTX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB. The Radeon X550XTX offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon X550XTX) vs 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) — the Radeon X550XTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon X550XTX) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X550XTX draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 6600's 140W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon X550XTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X550XTX) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-64% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+180% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X550XTX is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | GeForce Go 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Lexa | GK106 |
| Release | March 27 2019 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #772 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















