CPU
GPU
Radeon X550XTX
Popular choices:
Radeon 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X550XTX.
| Insight | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 3100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon X550XTX, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 70.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+70.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X550XTX and Radeon 3100
Radeon X550XTX
The Radeon X550XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.
Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X550XTX scores 71 and the Radeon 3100 reaches 74 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X550XTX is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X550XTX) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon X550XTX) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71 | 74+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X550XTX draws 50W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X550XTX) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 1.5+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X550XTX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The Radeon 3100 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X550XTX) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the Radeon 3100 offers 78.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 2.5+79% |
| Codename | Lexa | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 27 2019 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #772 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X550XTX and Radeon 3100
