CPU
GPU
RADEON X700
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X700 is positioned at rank 354 and the GeForce 8400 is on rank 657, so the RADEON X700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The RADEON X700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700.
| Insight | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $10 for the RADEON X700, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 121.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+121.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 and GeForce 8400
RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
GeForce 8400
The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X700 scores 73 versus the GeForce 8400's 81 — the GeForce 8400 leads by 11%. The RADEON X700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce 8400 uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (RADEON X700) vs 384 (GeForce 8400). Raw compute: 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 73 | 81+11% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.29 TFLOPS+1208% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz+118% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 144+800% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+167% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8400 has 512 MB. The GeForce 8400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RADEON X700) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 draws 175W versus the GeForce 8400's 33W — a 136.5% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700) vs 350W (GeForce 8400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 33W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 106mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 2.5+525% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8400 launched at $45 and now averages $5. The GeForce 8400 costs 50% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.3 (RADEON X700) vs 16.2 (GeForce 8400) — the GeForce 8400 offers 121.9% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | RADEON X700 | GeForce 8400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $45-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $5-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3 | 16.2+122% |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GM108 |
| Release | June 9 2021 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #90 | #850 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X700 and GeForce 8400
