CPU
GPU
RADEON X800 XL
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 XL is positioned at rank #368 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XL
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 XL.
| Insight | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 XL offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 217.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+217.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 XL and Radeon X1650 SE
RADEON X800 XL
The RADEON X800 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X800 XL scores 69 and the Radeon X1650 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 XL is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON X800 XL) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69 | 71+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2581 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 XL comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 XL draws 300W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon X1650 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 XL) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.3+50% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 XL launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON X800 XL costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.6 (RADEON X800 XL) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) — the RADEON X800 XL offers 228.6% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X800 XL | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.6+229% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #42 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X800 XL and Radeon X1650 SE
