
Radeon HD 2350

RADEON X800 XL
Radeon HD 2350 vs RADEON X800 XL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 2350 vs RADEON X800 XL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 2350 vs RADEON X800 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 2350
2012Why buy it
- ✅+11.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 678.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RADEON X800 XL
2020Why buy it
- ✅Radeon HD 2350 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X800 XL is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (69 vs 77).
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌598% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 2350 vs RADEON X800 XL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.

RADEON X800 XL
The RADEON X800 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 2350 scores 77 versus the RADEON X800 XL's 69 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 11.6%. The Radeon HD 2350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON X800 XL uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XL). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XL). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 77+12% | 69 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4608+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+623% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2250 MHz+80% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 112 | 288+157% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 1 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350 and 64-bit on the RADEON X800 XL. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 2350) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 XL) — the RADEON X800 XL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 2350 draws 200W versus the RADEON X800 XL's 300W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 2350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 2350) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XL). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 2350 came in at $50, while the RADEON X800 XL launched at $349. On MSRP, Radeon HD 2350 was 85.7% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) vs 0.2 (RADEON X800 XL) — the Radeon HD 2350 offers 650% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X800 XL (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 2350 | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-86% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5+650% | 0.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 31 2012 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #454 | #42 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














