Radeon Xpress 1250 vs Quadro FX 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

98%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

96%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

93%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

93%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

91%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

84%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

81%

#213

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3283%

#228

Quadro FX 350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

96%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

81%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

81%

#241

FirePro S7000

MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40

80%

#242

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

80%

#243

FirePro V7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $100

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Xpress 1250 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 350M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1250 and Quadro FX 350M

Radeon Xpress 1250

The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Xpress 1250 scores 43 and the Quadro FX 350M reaches 45 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	43	45+5%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8064 TFLOPS+30%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Xpress 1250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 350M has 256 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9_0b	9.0c
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD (VP1).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1250	Quadro FX 350M
Encoder	Avivo	None
Decoder	Avivo	PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Xpress 1250 draws 65W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 97.6% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.