Radeon Xpress 1250 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Xpress 1250 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon Xpress 1250, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 59.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1250 and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Xpress 1250 scores 43 and the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 reaches 42 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 43+2% | 42 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5833% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2920 MHz+178% |
| ROPs | 8 | 128+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 256+967% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 9.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Decoder: Avivo vs VideoShader.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | None |
| Decoder | Avivo | VideoShader |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1250 draws 65W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 128.8% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 175mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-78% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 175mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7+600% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Xpress 1250 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.9 (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 55.6% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $30-39% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 1.4+56% |
| Codename | Oland | Navi 48 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #871 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1250 and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
