Radeon Xpress 1250 vs GeForce Go 7200
Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1250 and GeForce Go 7200
Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
GeForce Go 7200
The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Xpress 1250 scores 43 and the GeForce Go 7200 reaches 45 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce Go 7200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7200). Raw compute: 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 43 | 45+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8064 TFLOPS+6% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7200 has 65 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1250 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0b | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs None (GeForce Go 7200). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | None |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1250 draws 65W versus the GeForce Go 7200's 64W — a 1.6% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 64W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1250 | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Oland | GK107 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #871 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Xpress 1250 and GeForce Go 7200
