Radeon Xpress 1300 vs FirePro 2450

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Xpress 1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 2450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 2450.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro 2450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon Xpress 1300, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 380.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+380.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)	✅More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Xpress 1300 Benchmark Check

FirePro 2450 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300 and FirePro 2450

Radeon Xpress 1300

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Xpress 1300 scores 52 and the FirePro 2450 reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the FirePro 2450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 384 (FirePro 2450). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
G3D Mark Score	52+2%	51
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+233%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.224 TFLOPS+669%	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2450) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 10.1 (FirePro 2450). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
DirectX	9.0c	10.1+12%
OpenGL	2.0	3.3+65%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs UVD (FirePro 2450). Decoder: Avivo vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
Encoder	None	UVD
Decoder	Avivo	UVD
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Xpress 1300 draws 85W versus the FirePro 2450's 150W — a 55.3% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 350W (FirePro 2450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 60°C.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	FirePro 2450
TDP	85W-43%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75	60°C-20%
Perf/Watt	0.6+100%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the FirePro 2450 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The FirePro 2450 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.1 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 5.1 (FirePro 2450) — the FirePro 2450 offers 363.6% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).