
Radeon Xpress 1300 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon Xpress 1300
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Radeon Xpress 1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300 and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon Xpress 1300
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300 scores 52 versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 59 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 13.5%. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52 | 59+13% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+567% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.224 TFLOPS+511% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Xpress 1300 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+426% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Xpress 1300 draws 85W versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 116W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-27% | 116W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.1 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Xpress 1300 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GF116 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #351 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















