Radeon Xpress 1300 vs Radeon 2100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100

#715

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

27142%

#717

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

24605%

#718

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

24540%

#722

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

22315%

#723

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

22163%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

95%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

93%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

90%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

85%

#730

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

83%

#731

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

83%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

75%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

75%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

72%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

55%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

50%

#738

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

50%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

40%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

37%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1300.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 15.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon Xpress 1300.

Insight	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+15.4%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Xpress 1300 Benchmark Check

Radeon 2100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Xpress 1300 and Radeon 2100

Radeon Xpress 1300

The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Xpress 1300 scores 52 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 15.4%. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
G3D Mark Score	52	60+15%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+233%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.224 TFLOPS+437%	0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1650 MHz+61%	1024 MHz
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	2 MB+1438%	0.13 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+1438%	0.13 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
DirectX	9.0c	9.0b
OpenGL	2.0	2.0
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
Encoder	None	Avivo
Decoder	Avivo	Avivo
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Xpress 1300 draws 85W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Xpress 1300	Radeon 2100
TDP	85W	50W-41%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	0.6	1.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Xpress 1300 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.1 (Radeon Xpress 1300) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon 2100 offers 9.1% better value. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).