GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon 2100
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 36853.3% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+36853.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-36853.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 8953.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8953.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon 2100
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 36853.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+36853% | 60 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+2483% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+68% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+6344% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 2100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6+130% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Avivo |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+8300% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The Radeon 2100 costs 75.5% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 9141.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $149-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $49-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+9142% | 1.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #63 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon 2100
