RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000E Ada Generation remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 15,073 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 88 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,073 | 15,252+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 50W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-29% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 167mm |
| Height | 68mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 301.5+38% | 217.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
