
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 15,073 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 88 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,073 | 15,252+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 50W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-29% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 167mm |
| Height | 68mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 301.5+38% | 217.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













