
Quadro RTX 5000

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 15,073 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 384 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443+2% | 15,073 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+9% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz | 2130 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+118% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+7% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+118% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 384+336% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 167mm |
| Height | — | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1 | 301.5+349% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | AD107 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #143 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














