Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 5000

2018

Why buy it

✅21.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
❌30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU instead at 15,633 vs 15,443, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro RTX 5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 5000

The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	15,443	15,633+1%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072	3584 ×2+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.15 TFLOPS+4%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1815 MHz+21%	1500 MHz
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	192	224 ×2+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+241%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 26.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 5000	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	230W-23%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	67.1+29%	52.1