Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (32 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 5000.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 2.0) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,633+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584 ×2+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS+4% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz+21% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224 ×2+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+241% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 26.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-23% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1+29% | 52.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
